Available now
Results, probabilities and confidence
The result page is designed as an evidence hierarchy: verdict first, probability second, contributing signals third. Confidence describes evidence depth rather than certainty about authorship.
Result anatomy
| Element | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Verdict | Plain-language direction based on the combined reading |
| AI probability | Normalized strength of AI-leaning signals in this analysis |
| Confidence | How much suitable evidence was available |
| Signal pills | Named checks and their measured contribution |
| Details | Model, report identifier, format, timing and technical context |
Compare like with like
Scores from a 20-word excerpt and a 1,000-word article do not have the same evidence depth. Likewise, an original PNG with metadata and a recompressed screenshot offer different source signals.
- Use similar lengths when comparing text samples.
- Keep image format and resolution comparable.
- Record whether a sample was copied, translated, resized or recompressed.
- Use the same detector version when tracking changes over time.
Turn a result into a review
A useful workflow connects the signal to the underlying material. For text, inspect the highlighted passages and source history. For images, compare provenance, visible labels, model readings and file-level evidence.