Is this video AI?

A convincing clip can still break down between frames. IA Checker’s planned video detector is being designed to review a sequence rather than judge one thumbnail, bringing motion, visual consistency and file context into one cautious report.

What an AI video review should inspect

Video needs a different analysis path from a still image. The detector will compare evidence across time before it presents a result.

Frame-to-frame consistencyFaces, hands, lettering and background objects should remain coherent as the scene changes, rather than drifting or reforming between frames.
Motion and physical behaviorCamera movement, lip sync, reflections, shadows and object motion can expose temporal artifacts that are invisible in a single screenshot.
Encoding and edit contextWhere the file allows it, export details and edit history can add context without being treated as proof of how the video was made.

A video score is a lead, not a verdict

Compression, frame interpolation, captions and aggressive editing can resemble generation artifacts. A useful result must show which signals influenced the score so a person can inspect the original clip and its source.

That is why IA Checker will not promise certainty from a number alone. The goal is to help reviewers decide what deserves a closer look, especially when a clip has been reposted, cropped or stripped of provenance.